Legislator HOA Report Card

Are they working for homeowners, or for the HOA industry?

Arizona’s HOA laws are written at the Legislature — and the HOA industry (home builders, the law firms that represent associations, and the big management companies) shows up to shape them. This report card follows two things you can check for every legislator: the money they take from that industry, and how they act on HOA bills. Then we grade the record.

Best & worst on HOA

Every graded member of each chamber, sorted by our grade. The top row is the homeowners’ champions; the bottom row has taken the most HOA-industry money with the least homeowner record to show for it. See all 90 →

The other side of the report card

Legislators are one half. The other half is the HOA industry that funds and lobbies them — graded on the same homeowner lens. Best & worst of each group below; browse the full lists on Follow the Money.

Who builds the communities

Home builders & developers see all →

101 Arizona homebuilders / developers (HBACA members) — listed for transparency, individually unrated.

1
Follow the money. HOA-industry campaign money — the AACM management-industry PAC, the Veridus lobbyists it retains, and homebuilder/developer PACs — from the AZ Secretary of State “See The Money” portal, each figure sourced. See who’s spending →
2
Follow the record. Sponsorships and recorded votes on HOA bills, from azleg.gov — sponsorship is the clean signal of who actually works for owners.
3
Weigh it. The dollar amount of industry money pulls a grade down; a real homeowner-protection record pulls it up and offsets the money. The grade is labeled opinion, sitting on the sourced facts.

Nonpartisan. We don’t care what party a legislator is from — only whether they work for the homeowner or for the people making money off them; both parties take the money, and our grades ding both. A public-interest, noncommercial project. Money, votes, and record entries cite public sources you can check; grades are labeled opinion and fair comment on public officials’ public conduct — not an accusation of any illegal deal. See the methodology.