Can Your HOA’s Management Company Act Like a Lawyer? In Arizona, Mostly No

Arizona’s State Bar has spelled out what non-lawyer community-association managers may and may not do — and “giving legal opinions” is squarely on the “may not” list.
Can Your HOA’s Management Company Act Like a Lawyer? In Arizona, Mostly No

BadHOA · July 31, 2026

When a homeowner pushes back on their HOA, the reply often comes not from the volunteer board but from the professional management company — sometimes citing statutes, asserting legal conclusions, or sending legal-sounding letters. How far can a non-lawyer manager actually go? Arizona’s State Bar has answered that question directly, and for most versions of it the answer is no.

The source: UPL Advisory Opinion 12-01

In March 2012 the State Bar of Arizona’s Committee on the Unauthorized Practice of Law issued Advisory Opinion 12-01, addressing what non-lawyer personnel employed by (or who own) community-association management companies (“CAMs”) may lawfully do on an association’s behalf.

One important caveat up front: by their own terms, these advisory opinions are advisory only and are not binding in a disciplinary or other legal proceeding. They carry persuasive weight, not controlling legal authority. This article is general information, not legal advice.

What counts as “the practice of law”

Arizona’s Supreme Court rules define it broadly. Under Rule 31(a)(2)(A), Ariz. R. Sup. Ct., “practice of law” means providing legal advice or services to or for another by:

  • preparing any document intended to affect or secure legal rights for a specific person or entity;
  • preparing or expressing legal opinions;
  • representing another in a judicial, quasi-judicial, or administrative proceeding;
  • preparing any document for filing in a court, administrative agency, or tribunal; or
  • negotiating legal rights or responsibilities for a specific person or entity.

Only a licensed attorney may do these things for someone else.

What the opinion says a management company’s non-lawyer staff may not do

The opinion works through six questions. In plain terms, it concludes that a CAM and its non-lawyer personnel generally may not:

  • be authorized — even by the management contract — to prepare or sign legal documents, provide “legal services,” or appear in a tribunal on the association’s behalf;
  • give legal advice or legal opinions, or appear in a tribunal, even if the employee is a certified legal-document preparer (such a person may prepare certain documents, but may not sign them or advise on them);
  • have the CAM’s in-house lawyers do legal work for the CAM’s association clients and charge the association for it;
  • call employees “paralegals” when what they are doing is preparing legal documents or negotiating legal matters;
  • be installed as an association officer or director for the purpose of signing legal documents or appearing in a tribunal (absent a genuine, independent basis such as real membership and election); or
  • negotiate legal matters with association members on the association’s behalf.

The narrow exception — and why it usually doesn’t help a CAM

There is a limited “incidental to a regular course of business” exception (Rule 31(d)(20)) that lets non-lawyers prepare documents for a business’s own internal use, as long as they are not made available to third parties. The opinion concludes this generally does not shield a management company: documents like liens or legal correspondence are, by their nature, made available to third parties — recorded, filed, or sent to homeowners — and a CAM is “one step removed” from the association, which makes the exception even harder to satisfy.

Why this matters for homeowners

This does not mean a manager can’t relay general, factual information — meeting dates, what a rule says on its face, how to submit a form. The line is at legal opinions and legal conclusions: interpreting a statute for you, telling you what the law requires or forbids, or negotiating your legal rights. Under Rule 31, that is lawyer work.

So if a management company is asserting legal conclusions at you — what a statute “requires,” who has “standing,” what you are or aren’t “entitled to” — it is fair to ask whether that is a legal opinion a non-lawyer may lawfully give, and to direct genuine legal questions to the association’s actual attorney.

What you can do:
  • Ask for the basis. If a manager asserts a legal position, ask them to identify the specific statute or rule and whether they are giving you a legal opinion.
  • Route legal questions to the lawyer. Legal interpretation is the association attorney’s job, not the manager’s.
  • Report suspected UPL. If you believe a non-lawyer is practicing law, the State Bar of Arizona’s Unauthorized Practice of Law program accepts reports.

Source: State Bar of Arizona, Committee on the Unauthorized Practice of Law, Advisory Opinion 12-01 (March 2012); Rule 31, Arizona Rules of the Supreme Court. This is general information, not legal advice, and advisory opinions are persuasive rather than binding.

General information, not legal advice. See the HOA Laws library for the statutes referenced above.

← All articles